Escobedo v. Illinois

ESCOBEDO V. ILLINOIS
SUMMARY: The case involved Danny Escobedo, who was arrested on January 19, 1960, for the murder of his brother-in-law, tho was released later contacting his lawyer. The lawyer told him not to answer any more(prenominal) questions if the police rearrested him. Ten days later, he was arrested a gage time and asked to see his attorney repeatedly but his betoken was denied.
His attorney went to the police station and asked to see Escobedo but was refused licence to see him. The police told Escobedo that his alleged coconspirator in the scene of his brother-in-law had confessed and Escobedo was involved. The police were able to obtain a written confession, and Escobedo was ultimately convicted of murder. Escobedo appealed his conviction, claiming his confession was obtained without his lawyer being present in infringement of his right to propose, and should be thrown out.
DECISION/REASONING: The unequivocal Courts decisiveness held for the first time that defendants had a right to counsel even before they were indicted for a certain crime.



Not allowing psyche to speak with an attorney, and not advising them of their right to remain silent after they have been arrested and before they have been interrogated is a denial of tending of counsel under the Sixth Amendment However, the decision was overshadowed by the courts Miranda decision two years later, and later decisions by both the arrogant Court and lower courts indicated the decision in Escobedo was to be hold in to its facts. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has never directly overruled Escobedo.
AMENDMENT: 6th amendment
effectuate: Escobedo has been limited by the Supreme Court and lower courts to precisely apply to the facts of its case, and since those facts were unusual, it is rarely invoked by a court as primary law when determining whether the right to counsel exists.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .