John Steinbeck’s Flight made numerous references to nature. His fate

John Steinbecks Flight made numerous references to nature. His fate is foreshadowed erst by his sister, Rosy, and other times by the philosophy of naturalism. reputation plays a big role in this story by presenting where Pèpe stood in comparison to the other beings of the world, much(prenominal) as snakes and lizards. Pèpe was between the two on the victuals chain. He killed a lizard, but the snake didnt show any fear toward him. Flight was naturalistic.

In naturalism, nothing is at random and everything is explainable. Every event can be explained in terms of natural causes, or natural laws. Pèpes death was justified by nature. It was as if he was a polar bear with no fur, which clearly cant survive in its natural habitat. Pèpe didnt oblige any sense of natures obstacles. As the slight intelligent being of nature, he was destined to die at a level below those that could survive. Naturalism doesnt dimension spiritual or supernatural support of any kind. Pèpe couldnt be saved by any subject matter of a miracle. The story had followed the philosophy of naturalism throughout Pèpes entire journey. His fate could be evidenced by the stupid actions he took to try and save himself, such as putting the dirty spider web in his cut, resulting in an infection. The philosophy of naturalism is a way of having everything be explained by nature.

Flight supports naturalism by giving detailed explanations to Pèpes actions and consequences. The milieu that Pèpe was in didnt look to offer any dish to him due to the demanding climate The corpse gathered quickly in the deep valley.(Steinbeck, Flight, 434) He wandered into the valley hoping for help, but only came into more trouble. Nature wasnt intending to help him survive. He was unprepared and therefore didnt bring in a chance to last amongst the others. We see Pèpes environment ripping him apart, indeed, as he walks The brush grabbed at his legs in the dark until one knee of his jeans was ripped.



(Steinbeck, Flight, 434) Pèpe didnt have knowledge of his own well being in the wild. He thought he was a man, and didnt bother to hang in and think about his safety. This led to even more difficulty as he tried to continue on. Its partly Pèpes mothers fault, for never helping him to learn what he would need to know. Pèpe had no chance after proving to be incompetent, concluding naturalism had taken place.

Flight was proven to be naturalistic. Pèpe couldnt survive in the mountains surrounding Monterey. They seemed to arrival on forever, and he was unable to cope with it. He was like a helpless animal in a biome which he could have no chance of escape. Pèpe paid the legal injury for being a fish out of water. His death proves naturalism in Flight.

If you want to get a full essay, orderliness it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.