Philosophy Of History

may 18 , 2010PHIL 485Final ExamSpring 2010Last Name , First NameStudent Number1 ) I break-dance upon t know much about history , and I wouldn t break a nickel for in completely the history in the arena . It means nothing to me . History is much(prenominal) or diminutive bunk . It s tradition . We don t destiny tradition . We fill to live in the present and the completely when history that is deserving a tinker s damn is the history we make without delay Henry Ford , Interview in Chicago Tribune (25 may 1916What is Ford s point ? Why did he say this ? Is he right ? Does his views of American traditions have any bearing on the past , or on today s historiansThe above mentioned recite by Henry Ford , is a representation of the foot that history is nothing more than tradition , which is not only old and bootles s but also an obstacle on the path towards progress .

Ford s point is , that its utterly fiddling to involve oneself with history since it is tradition , which is antithetical to progress . What is more important is to involve one self with the present since that where all the action and possibility for the future lies . Thus it s a foreclose to neglect and ignore history , condemning it as something vain per se . This idea got currency with the onset of forward-lookingity and post-modernity . The modern date was marked by a fundamental supplanting in the make-up of society due to industrialized mass-production...If you want to pack a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay